March 2015

Shark_AboveAt a time when companies are increasingly using “independent contractors” rather than W-2 employees, the risks and liabilities for misclassification have never been higher. And it just got harder for Michigan and other Midwest employers who are accused of improperly classifying their workforce after a 3/26/2015 ruling from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Specifically,

Pregnancy DiscriminationYesterday the U.S. Supreme Court issued the much anticipated opinion in a pregnancy discrimination claim, Young v . United Parcel Service.

For context, the claim in Young v UPS arose under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA). The PDA was added to Title VII (the gold-standard in terms of civil rights law prohibiting workplace discrimination)

Thanks to the National Labor Relations Board (the NLRB), companies need to add employee manuals to the list of things that need spring cleaning. Specifically, the NLRB’s Office of the General Counsel issued a 3/18/2015 report full of examples of how your company’s employee manual likely violates the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).

Updating Employee Personnel ManualsFor background,

Fog-&-Uncertainty.jpgA recent Delaware court case invalidating an employer’s non-compete agreement provides a cautionary reminder for companies with operations and employees in multiple states.

Specifically, in Ascension Ins. Holdings, LLC v. Underwood (Delaware, Jan. 28, 2015) the company, Ascension was incorporated in Delaware, but headquartered in California. California was also where the employee, Roberts Underwood worked.

same-sex coupleOver 370 companies, including small businesses and Fortune 100 companies, and business groups showed their support for same-sex couples seeking the right to marry by filing a brief in the same-sex marriage case Obergefell v Hodges pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Thirty-seven states and Washington, D.C. permit same-sex marriages under local laws or court

A proposed Michigan House Bill was recently introduced that would significantly limit the use of noncompete agreements (sometimes called covenants not to compete) in Michigan. Such agreements often restrict individuals from working for a competitor or other post-employment activities. Noncompete Restrictions

Specifically, State Represntative Peter Lucido (R) introduced HB 4198 on February 12, 2015, which has since

EEOC discrimination According to records released in February by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the agency had its lowest year in terms of monetary recovery since 1997 and other key numbers were also significantly lower. While there are a number of explanations offered for this reduction, including from the EEOC and employment attorneys, one explanation