
In a previous post (Noncompete Agreements – A Hurdle to Employment and Innovation?), we discussed research that suggested noncompete agreements hinder innovation.
Expanding on why innovation is hindered, in any context in which a noncompete agreement is entered into e.g., an employment relationship, a founder whose start-up is being acquired, or an owner selling his
Noncompete agreements and other restrictive covenants are customarily found in employment agreements and provided for in the sale of a business.
Business owners had a lot to cry about when it came to 2012 Michigan court decisions addressing noncompete agreements.
Regardless of your political preferences, President Obama’s election victory offers an important lesson that can be extended to your company’s protection of trade secret intellectual property.
The storm that has devastated the U.S. east coast has been dubbed
A fantastic, but often overlooked movie is
Last week I attended the
After an individual’s employment is terminated and that individual begins working for a competitor or starts his or her own business, a common question asked by both the individual and the former employer is whether a noncompete agreement can be used to restrict one’s post employment opportunities.
On September 11, 2012, Michigan took one step closer to implementing a court system specializing in handling business and commercial cases.